Retirement Planning
 Location:  Home > Music > The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo  
crime drama  lisbeth salander  stieg larsson  swedish  thriller  

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo

The Girl With the Dragon TattooDirector: Niels Arden Oplev
Actors: Michael Nyqvist, Noomi Rapace, Sven-Bertil Taube
Studio: Music Box Films Home Entertainment
Category: DVD

List Price: $29.95
Buy New: $9.83
as of 9/8/2010 15:25 CDT details
You Save: $20.12 (67%)



New (46) from $9.83

Seller: Richindiscounts
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars 221 reviews
Sales Rank: 42

Format: AC-3, Color, Dolby, Dubbed, DVD, NTSC, Subtitled, Widescreen
Languages: English (Subtitled), Swedish (Original Language), English (Dubbed)
Rating: R (Restricted)
Region: 1
Discs: 1
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Running Time: 152 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0
Dimensions (in): 7.1 x 5.4 x 0.6

MPN: MBODMBFHE005D
UPC: 705105743950
EAN: 0705105743950
ASIN: B003FBNJ4U

Theatrical Release Date: 2010
Release Date: July 6, 2010
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Similar Items:


Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
Studio: Southport Music Box Corpo Release Date: 07/06/2010 Run time: 152 minutes

Fans of Stieg Larsson's Men Who Hate Women may have been concerned about how the Swedish author's novel would translate to the screen, but they needn't have worried. Significant changes to the source material have been made, but director Niels Arden Opley's The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, as it's now called, is mostly riveting. As the story begins, middle-aged investigative journalist Mikael Blomkvist (Michael Nyqvist) has just been convicted of a bogus charge of libel against a rich and corrupt corporate hotshot when he's unexpectedly offered a most unusual gig. An aging captain of industry named Henrik Vanger (Sven-Bertil Taube) wants Blomkvist to figure out what happened to Vanger's niece, who disappeared more than 40 years earlier; not only is the old man convinced that she was murdered, but he suspects that another member of his large and rather disagreeable family (which includes several former Nazis) is the culprit. Blomkvist takes the job, which includes spending at least six months on Vanger's isolated island in the middle of winter. But what he doesn't know is that he's being spied on by twentysomething Lisbeth Salander (brilliantly played by Noomi Rapace in a career-making performance), the titular Girl and the possessor of remarkable skills as a sleuth and computer hacker. With her gothlike piercings and all-black clothes, Lisbeth is a vivid character, to say the least. While we don't exactly know the details of her dark past, it's obviously still with her; indeed, she's just been assigned a new "guardian" (like a parole officer) to look after her finances and other matters. We also know that she is not someone to mess with; when the guardian turns out to be a thoroughly vile monster, Lisbeth gets back at him in one of the more satisfying revenge sequences in recent memory. That Lisbeth and Mikael should end up working together, and more, isn't especially surprising. But the horrifying details and depths of depravity they uncover while working on the case (parallels to The Silence of the Lambs are facile but appropriate) definitely are, and Opley does a nice job of keeping it all straight. At more than two and a half hours, the film is long, with its share of grim, graphic, and scary moments, but The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is a winner. --Sam Graham


Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 221
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...45Next »



5 out of 5 stars GREAT Movie!   September 8, 2010
J (STL, MO USA)
My husband and I have not read the books yet but LOVED this movie when we stumbled upon it on InDemand. I'm usually not one for sub-titles but this movie grabbed my attention and I was hooked! The characters leave you wanting more. These will be the next books I read!


3 out of 5 stars It was okay, but...   September 8, 2010
Weezie
I enjoyed reading the book and had high expectations of the movie. Maybe it's my fault for expecting so much. The movie was okay. It was great to see some of the scenes come to life on the screen. I couldn't understand why so many things were left out and changed from the book.

SPOILER: How could you not have Mikael have a relationship Erika? He was portrayed as a ladies man in the book and he comes off the opposite in the movie. Why did they kill off Anita when she is alive and well in the book? Lisabeth's relationship with her initial guardian is non-existent and the small story with her mom was changed (remember her mom dies near the end of the book). Mikael and Lisabeth did not have the police involved with Martin - they left it in the hands of the Vanger family.

One thing I have to admit is that Noomi Rapace is excellent as Lisabeth. Without her I may have thought even less of the movie.



4 out of 5 stars Entertaining   September 7, 2010
E Jameson
I found this movie to be enjoyable. If you're tired of the same Hollywood type movies, you'll find this refreshing. The characters were interesting, actors were great, and the plot was engaging enough for me to give it 4 stars. My female friends who accompanied me did not find sexual violence in this movie to be disturbing as some reviews say but if you're sensitive, this movie may not be for you.


4 out of 5 stars I liked it more then I thought I would   September 6, 2010
beadingchef
I started hearing all about who was going to play Lisbeth in the american version. I did not know the story of the author, so I came to this movie with no idea what it was about. Now I know why there is such a buzz. Noomi Rapace is so good in this film as the mysterious and deliberate Lisbeth, I can't even imagine anyone being better. The financial journalist Mikael Blomkvist (Michael Nyqvist) is also well done. This movie can be graphic at times, but it held me through out. The pace is good, the screenplay well fleshed out and the soundtrack fits, the acting the scenery was all first rate. I had to read the novels after I watched the movie and I thought that the book was well captured. Good movie!


1 out of 5 stars Book? What Book?   September 5, 2010
Rick Goodner (Texas United States)
0 out of 3 found this review helpful

The book was great... the movie is passable but too bad it was not based on the book. It is very sad that the screenplay is a complete rewrite of the book. I have never been able to understand why producers of movies will buy the rights to a great book only rip the guts out of it... (Mayhaps, they just can't think of a good name for a movie so they buy one) they must really hate those who can make art. Anyone who gave this movie more than one star has not read the book... and if they say they have, they lie. Oh, and the lead male is fat. This movie is a maybe see the book is a must read.

Showing reviews 1-5 of 221
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...45Next »


Worthwhile Reading

Retirees Face Serious Longevity Risk
By Shelby Smith

Longevity risk: the risk of outliving your money...that is, the risk of running out of money before you do breath. This is the number one fear of most retirees...and for good reason. Retirement can last thirty years or longer, is the time of life when very expensive medical emergencies may strike or a sudden meltdown of the market could rob you of your financial resources. When you add in the uncertainties of the shrinking purchasing power of your fixed savings caused by inflation, rising property taxes, lower interest rates and your inability to work, it is easy to understand by Longevity Risk is top-of-mind for most retirees. Not much we can do about inflation and taxes except use our votes wisely to selecting honest, caring political representatives. Health can be controlled somewhat by eating right, exercising and not abusing our bodies by excessive smoking and drinking. Not much we can do about being excluded from the labor market nor can we control the economic cycles and interest rates. In fact about the only thing we can control for certain is how much risk we take with our retirement money.

If you have your retirement money in a risky place like the stock market and there is a meltdown, you'll probably suffer a significant loss with no way and no time to make it up. In fact, if you lose your retirement money because you gambled in the market and lost, there will be no second chance...you'll be dependent on the government, your children or a welfare organization. Not a pleasant thought and probably the main reason most retirees say living longer than their money is their number one fear. Unfortunately, far too many retirees have not taken steps to reduce their investment risks by heading for the safe places. Why is that?

First, you're bombarded with advertisement, advice and promises that encourage you to keep your money in the market. You're told that 'longer term' you'll do a lot better with stocks, bonds, mutual funds, diversified portfolios and other risky investments than if you keep your money in safe places like bank CDs, government bonds and fixed annuities. You're presented with slick graphs and charts showing that here's how much better you'll do with your money at risk. The entire brokerage industry is dependent upon you to put your money at risk in the market and they're working very hard to make sure you do. You can't read a newspaper personal advice column, watch the news or read any of the thousands of magazines or newsletter devoted to investing without being told you'll be much better off by placing your retirement money with Wall Street for safe keeping. You're never reminded of the market meltdown of 2000-2003 or the early 1970's nor are you reminded that currently Wall Street is awash in losses from their profligate activities. The incessant calls from your broker are about how now is the time to buy at bargain prices. What about the losses you already have? You're scared into believing that unless you put your money at risk you'll not make a reasonable return. In fact, you're told that if you keep your money super safe you'll realize your greatest fear of outliving your money. The truth is, you're a lot more likely to outlive your money by taking risks you can't afford than you are keeping it super safe and earning an interest rate that goes with safety. Remember that risk and reward are always traveling companions: if you have a chance to make a big return, it is certain that you are taking risks of loss. On the other hand, if you take zero risk of loss, your earnings will be positive and certain but not above market. So which do you prefer: the possibility of great growth but also the possibility of great losses OR absolute safety and a low but certain return? As Will Rogers once said, 'I'm more interested in the return of my money than the return on my money'. I think Mr. Rogers had it right when it comes to the average retiree.

The current state of the economy is less than reassuring: unemployment is rising, dollar is very weak and falling, oil is teetering near $100 barrel, housing market is totally depressed, sub-prime credit problems are spilling over into autos and credit cards, inflation is heading higher and there is widespread talk of recession. The Federal Reserve - the nation's guardian of monetary policy - is obviously scared stiff judging from the drastic moves they've made in recent weeks to rapidly force short-term interest rates into the basement. Most economists - including me - are skeptical that a nosedive of the economy can be avoided: recession is heading our way is what I see. Yet, you probably have most of your retirement assets in mutual funds [check your 401(k)], portfolios containing stocks and bonds and other risky investments. Have you forgotten what happened when the dot.com bubble burst? Have you thought about what you'd do if the market drops drastically? Do you realize you'll not have a second chance if you lose too much of your retirement money? What can you do?

One option is to look into locking in a guaranteed lifetime income you can't outlive. You see, there is insurance for longevity risk: insurance companies which are among the world's largest, strongest and oldest financial institutions are willing to guarantee you a lifetime income you can't outlive if you'll deposit with them some of your retirement money. They will take the risk associated with the markets, stocks losing value, real estate crashing and other unforeseeable developments that can erase your retirement money. You'll still be left with taxes, inflation, health issues and non-investment risks but you'll not be able to outlive your money. How can insurance companies make such guarantees? The same way they are able to insure your home, car, health, life, business and other valuables: the law of large numbers and spreading the risks. If you live too long and they lose money on guaranteeing you a lifetime income there is someone else in your cohort group that didn't live as long as they were expected. So, over time the numbers average out and the insurance company is able to manage the risk and make a profit. You, on the other hand, got protection from your most feared risk in retirement: outliving your money.

How do you find out more? Ask your financial advisor to talk to you about a guaranteed lifetime income secured by an insurance company. By the way, if your advisor starts talking about 'variable annuities' tell him or her that you want something without risk: mention a fixed annuity without downside risk and one that allows you to start, stop or store your guaranteed lifetime income. You don't have to give up control of your money to get a guaranteed lifetime income because in the past couple of years insurance companies have begun offering new products that specifically take care of longevity risk faced by retirees. These new plans allow you to change your mind if your circumstances change. Insist on flexibility and insist on no market risks. If you choose not to investigate this option but instead keep your retirement money exposed to the market, make sure you have a good answer for the following question: 'What will you do if the worse case becomes a reality?'

You've got once chance to get retirement right - check out the Retirement Pros website http://www.theretirementpros.com/ for free e-Reports, Calculators, Video Seminars, Safe Money Advisory newsletter and more.

CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
Brought to You by Sagetips, LLC in Association with Amazon.com
Retirement Facts

The number of active workers participating in an employment-based defined benefit (pension) plan has been steadily decreasing, while the number has been growing in 401(k)-type plans.

Information
Reverse Mortgages
Resources
Reverse Mortgage Rates
Chrysler Lifetime Warranty