|
Dead in the Family (Sookie Stackhouse, Book 10) |  | Author: Charlaine Harris Publisher: Ace Hardcover Category: Book
List Price: $25.95 Buy New: $13.53 as of 7/28/2010 16:22 CDT details You Save: $12.42 (48%)
New (82) Collectible (11) from $13.53
Seller: BRILANTI BOOKS Rating: 803 reviews Sales Rank: 52
Media: Hardcover Edition: 1 Pages: 320 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.2 Dimensions (in): 9.3 x 6.3 x 1.2
ISBN: 0441018645 Dewey Decimal Number: 813.54 EAN: 9780441018642 ASIN: 0441018645
Publication Date: May 4, 2010 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| | ISBN13: 9780441018642 | | | Condition: New | | | Notes: BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one million books sold! 98% Positive feedback. Compare our books, prices and service to the competition. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed |
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description The #1 New York Times bestselling Sookie Stackhouse series- the basis for HBO(r)'s True Blood-continues!
After enduring torture and the loss of loved ones during the brief but deadly Faery War, Sookie Stackhouse is hurt and she's angry. Just about the only bright spot in her life is the love she thinks she feels for vampire Eric Northman. But he's under scrutiny by the new Vampire King because of their relationship. And as the political implications of the Shifters coming out are beginning to be felt, Sookie's connection to the Shreveport pack draws her into the debate. Worst of all, though the door to Faery has been closed, there are still some Fae on the human side-and one of them is angry at Sookie. Very, very angry...
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 803
It's a good read. July 28, 2010 V. Cole (Culver, IN USA) Seriously, I do not understand why people feel so "cheated" by the book. It was standard Sookie Stackhouse. Quick, easy to read, fun. The only parts I could have lived without were the graphic sex scenes between Sookie and Eric. It's treading on Jean Auel territory, ala the later books, between Aila and Jondalar. But I skimmed them and went on. I prefer the book Sookie to the TV Sookie. She's a much more interesting person in print in my humble opinion. If you're a fan, you'll probably enjoy the book.:)
Ho-hum July 28, 2010 Samantha I have to agree with many of the reviews written here. I waited, not very patiently, for this latest installment and was left feeling very disappointed. After Bill declared his love for Sookie in the last book, and with Eric doing the same, I expected a lot of tension around that story line. Sadly Bill barely made an appearance, and Sookie spent a lot of the book not with Eric either. The ending felt very rushed and unsatisfactory with characters cleaning themselves up and just hopping into bed for a good nights sleep. Although I love this series I hope that Charlaine delivers on the next one. I felt this was a little lazy and it felt like a promise unfulfilled.
Good only if you're already hooked on the series. SPOILERS July 28, 2010 L. silva I was entertained by the book because it's a Sookie Stackhouse book. But honestly, that's pretty much it: loyalty-fueled interest. While it had some good moments, overall the story seemed disconnected, rushed through, and ultimately predictable...
First...TOO MANY CHARACTERS (old and many new ones) with their own little stories, most of which end up nowhere and are not connected to the main plot in any way. The result is pages and pages of nothing, followed by a clue to the plot, then more nothing, then more nothing, then some more clues, then the end. I feel that this book was a catalog of all the characters she created rather than actual story. Most of the time I found myself forgetting about so and so, and ultimately not caring.
Second...it doesn't make any sense that a child (vampire) would be stronger than his maker, or stronger than a vampire older than he/she. In fact, I'm pretty sure that that doesn't happen in any of her story lines - but somehow it did here. We were told before that a child cannot refuse the commands of its maker. For example, Eric could not refuse his maker "bed time" with him. Yet somehow, some child manages to completely ignore his maker in this story.
Third...it only took 1/3 of the book for me to find out who the culprit was. It was extremely predictable.
Fourth...you spend an entire book practically running away from "uncle", only to get zero explanation from said uncle (don't want to give too much here).
Finally...the ending was crap. Of all the Sookie Stackhouse stories, this had the most boring ending. I could almost see Harris deciding to go to sleep and just say "the end". In fact, if anything this book didn't leave much to lead into an 11th book.
Overall, out of love for the characters I couldn't rate this as "I don't like it", so I gave it three stars. I expected more, so much more especially since book nine left us with a hanging question: "who IS the vampire Niall told Sookie about before he disappeared?"
The worst July 27, 2010 Kelly Wilson 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
I love the southern vampire books but this was awful. I was at the store at midnight to get this and I have to say I feel like a idiot now.The book was so boring.
Should Have Been a Chapter July 27, 2010 Teacakes 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Seriously, this book could have been one or two chapters. At the end I was left wondering "huh"? I felt totally ripped off. If this is what we can expect from yet to come books from this series then I say, with all due respect, "wrap it up, Ms. Harris". Sadly I'm putting this series in the "couple of seasons past it's prime" category. Next book will be checked out from the library or bought from a used book store if at all.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 803
|
| Worthwhile Reading | Retirees Face Serious Longevity Risk By Shelby Smith
Longevity risk: the risk of outliving your money...that is, the risk of running out of money before you do breath. This is the number one fear of most retirees...and for good reason. Retirement can last thirty years or longer, is the time of life when very expensive medical emergencies may strike or a sudden meltdown of the market could rob you of your financial resources. When you add in the uncertainties of the shrinking purchasing power of your fixed savings caused by inflation, rising property taxes, lower interest rates and your inability to work, it is easy to understand by Longevity Risk is top-of-mind for most retirees. Not much we can do about inflation and taxes except use our votes wisely to selecting honest, caring political representatives. Health can be controlled somewhat by eating right, exercising and not abusing our bodies by excessive smoking and drinking. Not much we can do about being excluded from the labor market nor can we control the economic cycles and interest rates. In fact about the only thing we can control for certain is how much risk we take with our retirement money.
If you have your retirement money in a risky place like the stock market and there is a meltdown, you'll probably suffer a significant loss with no way and no time to make it up. In fact, if you lose your retirement money because you gambled in the market and lost, there will be no second chance...you'll be dependent on the government, your children or a welfare organization. Not a pleasant thought and probably the main reason most retirees say living longer than their money is their number one fear. Unfortunately, far too many retirees have not taken steps to reduce their investment risks by heading for the safe places. Why is that?
First, you're bombarded with advertisement, advice and promises that encourage you to keep your money in the market. You're told that 'longer term' you'll do a lot better with stocks, bonds, mutual funds, diversified portfolios and other risky investments than if you keep your money in safe places like bank CDs, government bonds and fixed annuities. You're presented with slick graphs and charts showing that here's how much better you'll do with your money at risk. The entire brokerage industry is dependent upon you to put your money at risk in the market and they're working very hard to make sure you do. You can't read a newspaper personal advice column, watch the news or read any of the thousands of magazines or newsletter devoted to investing without being told you'll be much better off by placing your retirement money with Wall Street for safe keeping. You're never reminded of the market meltdown of 2000-2003 or the early 1970's nor are you reminded that currently Wall Street is awash in losses from their profligate activities. The incessant calls from your broker are about how now is the time to buy at bargain prices. What about the losses you already have? You're scared into believing that unless you put your money at risk you'll not make a reasonable return. In fact, you're told that if you keep your money super safe you'll realize your greatest fear of outliving your money. The truth is, you're a lot more likely to outlive your money by taking risks you can't afford than you are keeping it super safe and earning an interest rate that goes with safety. Remember that risk and reward are always traveling companions: if you have a chance to make a big return, it is certain that you are taking risks of loss. On the other hand, if you take zero risk of loss, your earnings will be positive and certain but not above market. So which do you prefer: the possibility of great growth but also the possibility of great losses OR absolute safety and a low but certain return? As Will Rogers once said, 'I'm more interested in the return of my money than the return on my money'. I think Mr. Rogers had it right when it comes to the average retiree.
The current state of the economy is less than reassuring: unemployment is rising, dollar is very weak and falling, oil is teetering near $100 barrel, housing market is totally depressed, sub-prime credit problems are spilling over into autos and credit cards, inflation is heading higher and there is widespread talk of recession. The Federal Reserve - the nation's guardian of monetary policy - is obviously scared stiff judging from the drastic moves they've made in recent weeks to rapidly force short-term interest rates into the basement. Most economists - including me - are skeptical that a nosedive of the economy can be avoided: recession is heading our way is what I see. Yet, you probably have most of your retirement assets in mutual funds [check your 401(k)], portfolios containing stocks and bonds and other risky investments. Have you forgotten what happened when the dot.com bubble burst? Have you thought about what you'd do if the market drops drastically? Do you realize you'll not have a second chance if you lose too much of your retirement money? What can you do?
One option is to look into locking in a guaranteed lifetime income you can't outlive. You see, there is insurance for longevity risk: insurance companies which are among the world's largest, strongest and oldest financial institutions are willing to guarantee you a lifetime income you can't outlive if you'll deposit with them some of your retirement money. They will take the risk associated with the markets, stocks losing value, real estate crashing and other unforeseeable developments that can erase your retirement money. You'll still be left with taxes, inflation, health issues and non-investment risks but you'll not be able to outlive your money. How can insurance companies make such guarantees? The same way they are able to insure your home, car, health, life, business and other valuables: the law of large numbers and spreading the risks. If you live too long and they lose money on guaranteeing you a lifetime income there is someone else in your cohort group that didn't live as long as they were expected. So, over time the numbers average out and the insurance company is able to manage the risk and make a profit. You, on the other hand, got protection from your most feared risk in retirement: outliving your money.
How do you find out more? Ask your financial advisor to talk to you about a guaranteed lifetime income secured by an insurance company. By the way, if your advisor starts talking about 'variable annuities' tell him or her that you want something without risk: mention a fixed annuity without downside risk and one that allows you to start, stop or store your guaranteed lifetime income. You don't have to give up control of your money to get a guaranteed lifetime income because in the past couple of years insurance companies have begun offering new products that specifically take care of longevity risk faced by retirees. These new plans allow you to change your mind if your circumstances change. Insist on flexibility and insist on no market risks. If you choose not to investigate this option but instead keep your retirement money exposed to the market, make sure you have a good answer for the following question: 'What will you do if the worse case becomes a reality?'
You've got once chance to get retirement right - check out the Retirement Pros website http://www.theretirementpros.com/ for free e-Reports, Calculators, Video Seminars, Safe Money Advisory newsletter and more.
|
|
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED βAS ISβ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME. | | Retirement Facts | | Whether a worker is offered and participates in a retirement plan at work depends greatly on what type of worker the person is:
Public-sector workers have the highest level of participation in a retirement plan (75.8% in 2004), while parttime workers typically are not offered a retirement plan or rarely participate when they are.
Among all workers, less than half (41.9% in 2004) participate in a retirement plan.
Among full-time, full-year wage and salary workers, more than half (56.6% in 2004) participate in a retirement plan.
|
|
|
|